Cases 21 - 30 of 265
Anderson v. California Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2015cv01045
Petitioner:
Arthur Anderson
Respondent:
California Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Christopher Brandon v. Los Angeles County Superior Court et al
as 2:2015cv02187
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, Los Angeles County Superior Court and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Jeremy Christopher Brandon
Woods v. Chappell et al
as 4:2015cv01291
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Veteran Administration, The, Board of Prison Terms, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Balls, et al
as 2:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Gregory Downs
Defendant:
Lori Balls and Chief Deputy Commissioner of the Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrell v. State of California, et al
as 2:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Joshua Neil Harrell
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. California Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2014cv02610
Petitioner:
Kim L. Owens
Respondent:
California Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. Board of Prison Terms
as 1:2015cv00773
Petitioner:
James D. Chavez
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2014cv02193
Petitioner:
James D. Chavez
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiltation et al
as 2:2014cv06475
Defendant:
Errick Alrond, Board of Prison Terms Board Members, California Department of Corrections and Rehabiltation and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Chavez v. Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2014cv01260
Petitioner:
James D. Chavez
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
