Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Brian Young v. Patrick Covello
as 20-70445
Respondent: PATRICK COVELLO
Petitioner: BRIAN YOUNG
Brian Young v. Marcus Pollard
as 19-72524
Petitioner: BRIAN YOUNG
Respondent: MARCUS POLLARD, Warden
LAI v. DREYFUS CO., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv16417
Defendant: BNY Mellon Transfer, Inc., formerly known as Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. incorrectly identified as Dreyfus Co., Law Offices of Brian Young & Associates, NANCY STEBE and others
Plaintiff: KATHARINE WANG LAI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Cramer v. Barry Jones, et al
as 19-16144
Defendant / Appellee: JASON SALAZAR, Chief of Police at City of Visalia Police Department, BARRY JONES, Chief of Police at City of Tulare, MCKEWEON, Police Officer at City of Visalia and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW B CRAMER
Young v. Superior Court County of Alameda
as 5:2019cv02117
Respondent: Superior Court County of Alameda
Petitioner: Brian Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cramer v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00161
Defendant: Jason Salazar, Brian Young, Barry Jones and others
Plaintiff: Matthew B. Cramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Young v. Michael Martel
as 18-71981
Petitioner: BRIAN YOUNG
Respondent: MICHAEL MARTEL
YOUNG v. FUTURE FOAM, INC.
as 1:2018cv09771
Plaintiff: EDWARD BRIAN YOUNG
Defendant: FUTURE FOAM, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS, BUSINESSES, PARTNERSHIPS OR ANY OTHER BUSINESS ENTITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brian Young v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 17-72621
Petitioner: BRIAN YOUNG
Respondent: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden
WILLIAMS v. SULKIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01483
Plaintiff: MICHAEL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant: DAVID J. SULKIN, BRIAN YOUNG, JEFF REEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?