Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
HOLCOMB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00791
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALVIN KELLER and BUTCH JACKSON
Petitioner: BARRY HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2010ct03158
Plaintiff: Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant: Nurse Rowe, Paula Smith, Sher Guleria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. JACKSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00436
Petitioner: MICHAEL IVER PETERSON
Respondent: BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2010ct03059
Plaintiff: Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant: Veronica Shaw and Butch Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOVER v. JACKSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00168
Petitioner: JOSEPH EUGENE HOOVER
Respondent: BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Keller et al
as 5:2009ct03165
Plaintiff: Frank Mitchell
Defendant: Alvin Keller, Jr., Butch Jackson, Cleo Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. Jackson
as 5:2009hc02102
Petitioner: Jose Luis Macias
Respondent: Butch Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STARNER v. JACKSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00129
Petitioner: RONALD RAY STARNER
Respondent: BUTCH JACKSON and NASH CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. JACKSON
as 1:2008cv00869
Petitioner: TIMOTHY KINNARD WILLIAMS
Respondent: BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nickerson v. Wiggins et al
as 5:2008ct03137
Plaintiff: Lindo Nickerson
Defendant: Wiggins, Jackson, Cleo M. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?