Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castro et al v. Hurley et al
as 1:2010cv03527
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Castro and Sujeiri C. Martinez
Defendant:
Dewayne Eck Hurley and National Carriers
Counter_claimant:
Dewayne Eck Hurley and National Carriers
Counter_defendant:
Carlos C. Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Martha C. Castro
as 2:2009cv06383
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Martha C. Castro, DC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. Castellaw et al
as 5:2009cv03259
Plaintiff:
Randall Dean Holmes
Defendant:
D. Castellaw, M. Cook, M. A. Smelosky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Martha C. Castro
as 2:2009mc00174
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Martha C. Castro, DC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.78 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 7:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.78 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, Augusto O. Champion, III, Jorge P. Champion and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Castro et al
as 1:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Candido I. Castro and Sean C. Castro
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arthur Castro v. James Yate
as 08-17147
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR C. CASTRO
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES
Cornelio Castro-Cabrera, et al v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-72923
Petitioner:
CORNELIO C. CASTRO-CABRERA and MIRIA YOLANDA MENDEZ-JOLOMOCOX, Nancy Celis
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
