Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Banbury v. Sheridan C.C. Westcare Foundations
as 1:2021cv01242
Plaintiff:
Bryan Banbury
Defendant:
Sheridan C.C. Westcare Foundations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Miracle et al
as 3:2020cv01140
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. Mason, Lieutenant Miracle and others
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Miracle et al
as 4:2020cv04224
Defendant:
. Frank, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewlett v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06089
Defendant:
SZC Zerba, Baker, C.C. DOC and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Hewlett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longstreet v. Illinois Dept Of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv05826
Defendant:
Gedminas, NRC Stateville C.C, Illinois Dept Of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony O'Dell Longstreet, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. C.C. Dillon Co.
as 1:2020cv02470
Defendant:
C.C. DILLON CO.
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Whobrey, Central States Se & Sw Areas Pension Fund and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Washington v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01762
Defendant:
T. Wade, Illinois Department of Corrections, Stateville/NRC and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peat v. N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service
as 1:2020cv00380
Defendant:
N.R.C. Stateville C.C. Field Service
Plaintiff:
James Peat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil v. I.D.O.C et al
as 1:2019cv08524
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Virgil, Jr.
Defendant:
Stateville C.C., John Doe, Etc, N.R.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortega v. Bautista et al
as 1:2019cv05194
Defendant:
Doctor Henzee, Jane/John Doe, Doctor Bautista and others
Plaintiff:
John Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
