Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 240
LEWIS-BEY v. PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv02890
Plaintiff: TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant: PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS, BLANCHE CARNEY, TERRANCE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLAND v. CFCF We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02361
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN HOLLAND
Defendant: CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUZAN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM/C.F.C.F et al
as 2:2017cv01370
Plaintiff: PAUL WILLIAM KUZAN
Defendant: MRS. HENDERSON (CFCF), MRS. TULLER (PICC), MRS. PIERCE (PICC) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRICK v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv06399
Plaintiff: KERIUM GARRICK, SR.
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM - CFCF & PICC and TABITHA HATCHER
Petitioner: CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and PHILADELPHIA INDUSTRIAL CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PETERSON v. HOUSE OF CORECTION et al
as 2:2016cv06363
Plaintiff: DEREK PETERSON
Defendant: HOUSE OF CORECTION and CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENNING v. CFCF et al
as 2:2016cv06347
Plaintiff: JAMES B. HENNING
Defendant: CFCF and C/O'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. CFCF
as 2:2016cv05403
Plaintiff: MATHENO EL
Defendant: CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF et al
as 2:2016cv05268
Plaintiff: MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant: CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF, RASOL HINTON, C. EAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILBORNE v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv05120
Plaintiff: GARLAND KEVIN WILBORNE
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM and CFCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEAUFORD v. THE WARDEN OF CFCF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04994
Plaintiff: TYRONE BEAUFORD
Defendant: THE WARDEN OF CFCF PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY PRISON AND ALL CHAINE OF COMMEND OFFICIALS, CFCF MEDICAL SUPERVISOR AND ASISTANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?