Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Porter, Brandon et al v. Miesner, M. et al
as 3:2017cv00726
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Porter
Defendant:
M. Miesner , J. Nickel, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2017cv01093
Plaintiff:
Laleace Thurman
Defendant:
Cheryl Schwartz, Tiffany Schultz, Maria T Kiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ratliff v. JC Christensen and Associates Inc
as 1:2016cv01583
Plaintiff:
Travis Ratliff
Defendant:
JC Christensen and Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
R., S. v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00632
Plaintiff:
S. E. R.
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department and Darryl L. Christensen
Intervenor:
Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C., S. v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
S. L. C.
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department and Darryl L. Christensen
Intervenor:
Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.M., S. v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00631
Plaintiff:
S. A. L.M.
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department and Darryl L. Christensen
Intervenor:
Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
