Cases 21 - 30 of 114
Ingram v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2022cv00778
Plaintiff:
Orayl Ingram
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Va City Of Fairfax, Fairfax County Department of Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forrester v. Combs
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Forrester
Defendant:
Todd Anthony Combs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter
Defendant:
Larry Ross Collins, D. Barton, C.C. Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz et al v. Chapman et al
as 5:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Zachary Cruz, Micheal Donovan and Richard Moore
Defendant:
Duane Lee Chapman, Lyssa Chapman, David Bayre Briggman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Leon J. Brown
Defendant:
W.R. Hensley, R. Cochrone, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Ewing, W.R. Hensley, Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Peewee C. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Jackie Bird, et al
as 7:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Elbert Cassay, Jackie Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Micheal Goss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holley v. Combs et al
as 7:2020cv00545
Defendant:
C/O Muncy, C/O Lawson, C/O M. Wynn and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield William Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00495
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Lynn Hubbard
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC doing business as Texas Roadhouse, Andrew Nathan Combs and McNeil Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
