Cases 21 - 30 of 18,173
Sosa v. Lumpkin
as 24-10482
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Sosa, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
McHenry v. Lumpkin
as 24-10481
Petitioner:
Jimmy Floyd McHenry
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Class v. Lumpkin
as 24-10483
Petitioner:
Luis E. Class
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Flowers v. Lumpkin
as 24-10486
Petitioner:
Matthew Lee Flowers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20239
Petitioner:
Robert F. Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Pate v. Warden FCI
as 24-50428
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna Camp
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SETH NORRIS, individually and as warden of Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and others
Morales v. Ross-Marinowski et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Robert Xavier Morales
Defendant:
LT Tanya Ross-Marinowski, CO Hanson, CO John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Lumpkin
as 24-40383
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Hendrix
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Randy Capehart v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 24-11795
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE CAPEHART
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF HEALTH SERVICES, WHEELER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
