Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Crawford v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00575
Plaintiff:
Shannon Crawford
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Catoosa Hospitality, LLC v. CR Crawford Construction, LLC
as 4:2019cv00563
Plaintiff:
Catoosa Hospitality, LLC
Defendant:
CR Crawford Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. USA
as 4:2019cv00420
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tracy Allen Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crawford v. Flint Medical Staffing Inc
as 5:2019cv00322
Defendant:
Flint Medical Staffing Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OKCDT Enterprise LLC et al v. CR Crawford Construction LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01134
Plaintiff:
Anish Hotel Group LLC and OKCDT Enterprise LLC
Defendant:
Scott Stokenbury, Cody Crawford, CR Crawford Construction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Express Services Inc et al
as 5:2018cv01127
Plaintiff:
Geraldina Crawford
Defendant:
Express Services Inc and Aecom Technical Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crawford v. CenterPoint Energy Resources, Corp.
as 4:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Prentice Antoine Crawford
Defendant:
CenterPoint Energy Resources, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell et al v. Smith et al
as 6:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sylvanius Bell, Ruth Bell and Angelia Bell
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Janice Tate, Martha Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bell et al v. Smith et al
as 6:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Sylvanius Bell, Ruth Bell and Angelia Bell
Defendant:
Robert Smith, Kevin Cowen, Kenneth Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walters v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00381
Plaintiff:
Ricco Dontae Walters
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Davis Correctional Facility, Oklahoma, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
