Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Caley
as 1:2021cv02808
Petitioner:
Marcus R. Reid
Respondent:
Ed Caley and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02622
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Respondent:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grey v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02620
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Grey and Christopher J. Kitrin
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Dean Williams, Leonard Woodson III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2021cv02633
Petitioner:
Charles Jeffrey McMillian
Respondent:
State of Colorado, Colorado Attorney General, The, Eddie Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Story v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv02563
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Scott Story
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Dean (I) Williams, Eddie Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crow v. Defuco et al
as 1:2021cv02289
Plaintiff:
Bradley E. Crow
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Colorado Time Comp Administrator, Caley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calley-Rae Pavillard v. Fanatics, Inc., et al
as 2:2021cv06508
Plaintiff:
Caley-Rae Pavillard
Defendant:
Fanatics, Inc., Does 1-10 inclusive and Fanatics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ricks v. Williams
as 1:2021cv02150
Petitioner:
Michael T. Ricks
Respondent:
Dean Williams
Defendant:
Eddie Caley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
CICCOTELLI v. AERPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03463
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
AERPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., STEVE PRELACK, ANUPAM DALAL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
