Cases 21 - 30 of 58
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Unified Recovery Group, LLC. et al
as 1:2014mc00268
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Unified Recovery Group, LLC., IED, LLC, International Equipment Distributors, Inc. and others
Whitefoot et al v. Sheriff of Clay County et al
as 1:2014cv00113
Defendant:
Sheriff of Clay County, Eddie Scott, Brad Pettit and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Whitefoot and Elena R. Whitefoot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Davidson, Cecil Belle and Liability Insurers of Each Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Service International, LLC et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Service International, LLC and Cecil Slade
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitefoot et al v. Two (2) Sheriffs of Clay County, et al
as 1:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
David J. Whitefoot and Elena R. Whitefoot
Defendant:
Two (2) Sheriffs of Clay County, Eddie Scott, Brad Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ben v. Denmark et al
as 3:2014cv00149
Plaintiff:
Cecil R. Ben
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cecil v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
James R. Cecil
Defendant:
Cullen T. Smith and DLT Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCrory v. United National Insurance Company
as 3:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
E. Cecil McCrory
Defendant:
United National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
