Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Cervantes v. Mitchel et al
as 1:2021cv01850
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of State of Illinois and David Mitchel
Petitioner:
Ramiro Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv01592
Defendant:
Alex Lopez, Benjamin Kibugi, Agustin Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Romeo and Jose Juan Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Henry County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv04241
Defendant:
Callie Anderson, R Cervantes, . Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Cassel Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Urbana et al
as 2:2020cv02257
Defendant:
David Roesch, Richard Coleman, Urbana Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Bridgestone Retails Operations LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02164
Defendant:
NA NA NA Bridgestone Americas Inc., NA, NA NA NA Bridgestone Retails Operations LLC, NA, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel Cervantes
Korman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Augustin A Cervantes, Nicole A Rodak, Felipe M. De La Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Maia Korman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Pfister et al
as 1:2020cv01720
Plaintiff:
Eddie Cervantes
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, John Does and Justin Hammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. City of Urbana IL et al
as 2:2020cv02054
Defendant:
Officer Dave Griffet, Officer Jay Loschen, Officer Michael Cervantes and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapleton v. Marcotte et al
as 2:2020cv02032
Defendant:
Christopher Whelchel, Bryant Seraphin, Urbana Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Fransohn Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of Urbana et al
as 2:2020cv02013
Plaintiff:
Quintin Brown
Defendant:
Matt Bain, Anthony Meenely, Richard Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
