Cases 21 - 30 of 304
Chapman v. Wigfall et al
as 6:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Danny Wigfall and FNU Varela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Don Ameche Levern Wright
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Cecilia Phalen Abbott, Farrel Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Townsend et al.
as 6:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Keith Rosell White
Defendant:
Lonnie E. Townsend, IV, Jason Chapman and Douglas W. Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Townsend et al
as 6:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Keith Rosell White
Defendant:
Lonnie E. Townsend, Jason Chapman and Douglas W. Foust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Abbott et al
as 3:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Don A Wright
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Cecilia Abbott, Creuzot John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chapman v. Thomas
as 4:2022cv03210
Petitioner:
Gerald Chapman
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Dianna Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schweitzer v. Dagle et al
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Schweitzer
Defendant:
J.W. Dagle, B.N. Bohnert, City of Galveston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
