Cases 21 - 30 of 55
ALLHOUSE et al v. GORELL et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
CINDY A. ALLHOUSE , TAMMY S. ARBLE , JAMES M. BLAIR and others
Defendant:
WAYNE GORELL and BRIAN ZIMMERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPPELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv07151
Petitioner:
DERRICK CHAPPELL
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAPPELL et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06324
Plaintiff:
JUDY CHAPPELL and MARCUS CHAPPELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHAPPELL v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
as 2:2013cv01210
Plaintiff:
JASON CHAPPELL
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLEARY v. HERTZ RENT-A-CAR et al
as 2:2013cv01824
Plaintiff:
LUKE CLEARY
Defendant:
HERTZ RENT-A-CAR, PURCO FLEET SERVICES, INCORPORATED and BOB CHAPPEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CHASE v. GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2012cv00180
Petitioner:
WARREN CHASE
Respondent:
GOV. MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, LT. GOV. ANTHONY G. BROWN, SECRETARY STATE, JOSHUA SHATSTERN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COKER-CHAPPELLE v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv03938
Plaintiff:
VANESSA COKER-CHAPPELLE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
BALLARD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07926
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HENRY BALLARD, III
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATER DEPT., REVENUE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. THOMAZ et al
as 2:2011cv07924
Plaintiff:
MAX GREGORY WARREN
Defendant:
CAMERON JIBRIL THOMAZ, ROSTRUM RECORDS, LLC, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
