Cases 21 - 30 of 73
BOOKER v. BALLARD et al
as 2:2012cv00152
Defendant:
BALLARD and CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2012cv00791
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT and JOHN C. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ACON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
GLENN ACON
Defendant:
MS. S. BEIGHLEY, H. G. CHURCH, KIMBERLY KLINK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BRAZELTON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00126
Petitioner:
BADAYAH BRAZELTON
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KAMINSKI v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00118
Petitioner:
ADAM KAMINSKI
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCKINLEY v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00109
Defendant:
Dr. BAILEY, Mrs. BIGLIEGH, PA BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE MCKINLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
STEWART v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00092
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Petitioner:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
IRIZARRY-CENTENO v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
ANGEL IRIZARRY-CENTENO
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLRED v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00078
Petitioner:
SHAWN LEE ALLRED
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
