Cases 21 - 30 of 271
SOLDRICH et al v. MERLIN LAW GROUP, P.A. et al
as 5:2018cv00619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. SOLDRICH and JO-ELLEN JACOBUS
Defendant:
MERLIN LAW GROUP, P.A. and CHARLES R. MATHIS, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ehrenberg et al v. LISK Trucking, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Charles R Ehrenberg , Valerie Ehrenberg and Raymond Neikam
Defendant:
LISK Trucking, Inc. and Luther R Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILTROUT et al
as 3:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TERESA A. WILTROUT and CHARLES R. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
FISHER et al v. GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES
as 2:2016cv04213
Defendant:
GOODE SKI TECHNOLOGIES
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. FISHER and DENNIS V. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BROUGH et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07210
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY BROUGH and CHARLES R. BROUGH
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEISTER v. JESSE & FRICHTEL, INC
as 2:2014cv01292
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. MEISTER
Defendant:
JESSE & FRICHTEL, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DICKERSON v. THOMAS
as 2:2013cv07195
Petitioner:
CHARLES R. DICKERSON
Respondent:
JOHN C. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PUGLIESE v. DAVIS
as 2:2013cv01760
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. PUGLIESE
Defendant:
CHARLES R. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
