Cases 21 - 30 of 43
LAWRENCE v. MERCER COUNTY PROBATION DIVISION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
as 3:2017cv13693
Plaintiff:
FELIX LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY PROBATION DIVISION CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP. V. PORRINO, et als
as 2:2017cv06299
Plaintiff:
SPACEAGE CONSULTING CORP.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, ESSEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, HUDSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
PINCKNEY v. ESSEX PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT UNIT
as 2:2017cv03794
Plaintiff:
DAVID H PINCKNEY
Defendant:
ESSEX PROBATION CHILD SUPPORT UNIT and JUDGE DONALD KESSLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MALHAN v. KERRY et al
as 2:2016cv08495
Plaintiff:
SURENDER MALHAN
Defendant:
JOHN KERRY, CHRISTOPHER S. PORRINO, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE SUPERIOR TRUST UNIT et al
as 2:2016cv01662
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE SUPERIOR TRUST UNIT, FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEE PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
