Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 17-1479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Griffin v. Kelly Insulation, Inc., et al
as 0:2017cv60430
Plaintiff:
Christopher Griffin
Defendant:
Kelly Insulation, Inc. and Leonard AJR Olivieri
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 17-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 17-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 17-1018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 16-1595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
BRZEZINSKI v. SPRINGDALE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2016cv00406
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL BRZEZINSKI
Defendant:
SPRINGDALE BOROUGH, SPRINGDALE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JULIO MEDEIROS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. SPRINGDALE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
DARBY NICHOLS
Defendant:
SPRINGDALE BOROUGH, SPRINGDALE BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, POLICE CHIEF JULIO MEDEIROS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Sanders v. Detroit Police Department, et al
as 16-1254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHRISTOPHE GRIFFIN
Griffin et al v. Three O Eight LLC
as 2:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Griffin , Alyssa M Mendoza and Nicholas M Johnson
Defendant:
Three O Eight LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
