Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Hunter v. City of Cranston, et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Hunter
Defendant:
City of Cranston and Sharon Cavalloro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wushuwunoag v. State Of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2016cv00476
Plaintiff:
Neesu Wushuwunoag
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, City of Providence and City of Cranston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WUSHUWUNOAG v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
NEESU WUSHUWUNOAG
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, CITY OF PROVIDENCE and CITY OF CRANSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson, et al v. City of Cranston, RI
as 16-1692
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KAREN L. DAVIDSON, DEBBIE FLITMAN, EUGENE PERRY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CRANSTON, RI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Wushuwunoag v. State of Rhode Island, et al.
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Neesu Wushuwunoag
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, City of Providence, City of Cranston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Josefson v. Fung et al
as 1:2016cv00154
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Josefson
Defendant:
Allan Fung, Marco Palombo , Robert Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WUSHUWUNOAG v. STATE OF RHODE ISLAND et al
as 1:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
NEESU WUSHUWUNOAG
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, CITY OF PROVIDENCE, CITY OF CRANSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of Cranston et al
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kenneth Adams
Defendant:
City of Cranston and Cranston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Repose, Inc. v. City of Cranston, Rhode Island
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Repose, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Cranston, Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
