Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Hampton Two Auto Corporation v. City of Dallas Texas
as 3:2020cv02097
Plaintiff:
Hampton Two Auto Corporation DBA Southwest Kia-NW and DBA Southwest Kia Mesquite and Hampton Two Auto Corporation doing business as Southwest Kia-NW doing business as Southwest Kia Mesquite
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Texas and City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. City of Dallas Texas et al
as 3:2020cv01526
Defendant:
Ulysha Renee Hall, John Doe Police Officers 1-50 and City of Dallas Texas
Plaintiff:
Vincent Doyle and Tasia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020xc00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Smith v. City of Dallas, Texas
as 3:2019cv02892
Plaintiff:
Elbert D Smith, II
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belmonte v. City of Dallas, Texas
as 3:2019cv02656
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Texas and City of Dallas Texas
Plaintiff:
Abel Belmonte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter v. City of Dallas Texas
as 3:2019cv01327
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Kelly Trotter
Defendant:
City of Dallas Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tenth Street Residential Association v. The City of Dallas Texas
as 3:2019cv00179
Defendant:
The City of Dallas Texas
Plaintiff:
Tenth Street Residential Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Portillo v. The City of Dallas, Texas et al
as 3:2018cv02246
Plaintiff:
Rosa Portillo
Defendant:
The City of Dallas, Texas and Christopher Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv02101
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DAVID BROWN, OFFICER DOES 1-5, City of Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
