Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Brown v. King et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00358
Defendant:
Sgt. Peterson, Commander Reed, Mrs Reece and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Raymond Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debose v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Lt. King, Sgt. Peterson, Assistant Commander Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Debose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Houston County Board of Health, Alabama Department of Corrections, Assistant Commander Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00340
Defendant:
Assistant Commander Moore, Sgt. Peterson, Lt. King and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Assistant Commander Moore, Sgt. Peterson, Lt. King and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
Assistant Commander Moore, Sgt. Peterson, James Brazier and others
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Assistant Commander Moore, Ms. Reece, Ms. Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Valenza et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jason Smoak, Sgt. Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balcom v. Culver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Sgt. Peterson, Lt. Moore, Sgt. McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Devone Balcom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
