Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Conway v. Pommier et al
as 6:2015cv02605
Plaintiff:
Kerry J Conway
Defendant:
Mitch Pommier, Jeff Vincent, Tristan Bouillion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04924
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04925
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Brooke v. State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council et al
as 2:2015cv04127
Plaintiff:
Huy T. Ngo, Martha Phillips, Kristen Price and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Taylor et al
as 3:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Jr
Defendant:
R H Taylor, Jonathan Brewer, LA Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poullard v. Sharp et al
as 5:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
John Poullard
Defendant:
Alvin Sharp, M Pittman, Conway Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poullard v. Sharp et al
as 3:2014cv00965
Plaintiff:
John Poullard
Defendant:
Alvin Sharp, M Pittman, Conway Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway et al v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company
as 3:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cherish Conway, Gary Conway and Joshua Conway
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramos et al v. Conway et al
as 6:2012cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jovanny Diaz Ramos , Jose Alberto Ramirez and Javier Enriquez Castillo
Defendant:
Jacqueline S Conway, Hartt Transportation Systems Inc and CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
