Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Martin v. Aargon Agency Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02362
Defendant:
Aargon Agency Inc., Central Credit Services Inc, Chase Cardholder Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Darian Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WALTER v. CREDICO, INC.
as 5:2015cv05437
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN WALTER
Defendant:
CREDICO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Badgley v. Credico, Inc
as 5:2015cv04045
Plaintiff:
David Badgley
Defendant:
Credico, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys v. Lake Mead Emergency Physicians, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00896
Defendant:
ACS Recovery Services, Inc., Agata-Venger Partnership, LLP, CHW Nevada Imaging Company, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys
Plaintiff:
Glen Lerner Injury Attorneys
ThirdParty Defendant:
Dina Hamilton
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Wilson-McShane Corporation
Counter Claimant:
Wilson-McShane Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
