Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 56
PEACHER v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv01349
Petitioner: R. PEACHER
Respondent: D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEACHER v. REAGLE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01348
Petitioner: R. PEACHER
Respondent: D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEACHER v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv01351
Petitioner: R. PEACHER
Respondent: D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEACHER v. REAGLE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01350
Petitioner: R. PEACHER
Respondent: D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POINDEXTER v. REAGLE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00156
Plaintiff: JWAUN POINDEXTER
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POINDEXTER et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: JWAUN POINDEXTER
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff: RODNEY PERRY, SR.
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00161
Plaintiff: RODNEY PERRY, SR.
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00154
Plaintiff: RODNEY PERRY, SR.
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POINDEXTER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff: JWAUN POINDEXTER
Defendant: D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?