Cases 21 - 30 of 57
MEIGHEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL PETER MEIGHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamar Harvey v. D. Landauer
as 20-6849
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BURCH, LEWIS, Augusta Correctional Center Officer, D. LANDAUER, N.P. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. PLAUTZ, MD Augusta Otolaryngology Assoc., DR. DANIEL PETERS, University of Virginia Health System, Otolaryngology, AUGUSTA OTOLARYNGOLOGY ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMAR DEVELL HARVEY
Hunnicutt, Sr. v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Defendant:
Astrid Castillo, New Mexico Corrections Department, German Franco and others
Plaintiff:
Carnell Hunnicutt, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunnicutt, Sr. v. Peters et al
as 2:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Astrid Castillo, German Franco, Estevan Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Carnell Hunnicutt, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mandelkow et al v. Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00315
Plaintiff:
Diane M Russo, Marilyn Guichardo, Kristine Achong and others
Defendant:
Republic of Iran Islamic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Jernigan v. Valencia et al
as 1:2019cv01177
Defendant:
FNU Valencia, Deborah Garcia, Janel Sarracino and others
Plaintiff:
Tramaine Jernigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vine v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00821
Respondent:
Daniel Peters and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Vine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Acosta v. Peters
as 2:2019cv00352
Defendant:
Daniel Peters
Petitioner:
Mario Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Silver v. Peters
as 2:2019cv00284
Respondent:
Daniel Peters
Petitioner:
Travis Silver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee Tabor v. Daniel Peter Morales et al
as 5:2018cv00360
Defendant:
Does and Daniel Peter Morales
Plaintiff:
Lee Tabor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
