Cases 21 - 30 of 55
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv98832
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00589
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66902
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04685
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Nicole Turnbull, Daniel Rogers, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Lopez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv00093
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Doe and Jane Doe #1-10, Police Officer Daniel Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Hood v. William Sullivan
as 20-70011
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROGER HOOD
Daniel Hood v. William Sullivan
as 19-71746
Respondent:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Petitioner:
DANIEL ROGER HOOD
Hood v. Director of the California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00882
Respondent:
Director of the California Department of Corrections, . and Vincent P. LaPietra
Petitioner:
Daniel Roger Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROGERS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00173
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROGERS and VICKI L ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
