Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Drummond v. Tritt et al
as 3:2016cv02135
Petitioner:
Ronald Drummond
Respondent:
Brenda Tritt and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DRUMMOND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv06240
Plaintiff:
RONALD DRUMMOND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ABELL v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2015cv01049
Plaintiff:
ABELL, THOMAS ABELL, KATHARINE ADAMS-LOVE and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, AGENTS PENSION PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DRUMMOND DECATUR AND STATE PROPERTIES, LLC v. MATERIALS PROCESSING CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv04821
Plaintiff:
DRUMMOND DECATUR AND STATE PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant:
MATERIALS PROCESSING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRUMMOND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv03663
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DRUMMOND
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA v. DRUMMOND
as 2:2014cv02804
Plaintiff:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
SHIRLEY DRUMMOND
Counter_claimant:
SHIRLEY DRUMMOND
Counter_defendant:
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
BOEHMER et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv01620
Plaintiff:
KENNETH BOEHMER , LIZETTE CABALLERO-VARGAS , CURTIS DRUMMOND and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRUMMOND SCIENTIFIC COMPANY v. ACTGENE, INC.
as 2:2013cv06234
Plaintiff:
DRUMMOND SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
Defendant:
ACTGENE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
