Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Wooden et al
as 1:2020cv02613
Defendant:
Damon C. Bova and Robert S. Wooden
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickerson v. USA-2255
as 1:2020cv02442
Petitioner:
Damon Dickerson
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elliott v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv01898
Plaintiff:
Damon Elliott
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace et al v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2020cv01312
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harris, Alan Ford, Gary Wallace and others
Defendant:
Dr. K. Temesgen, Corizon Health Services, Dr. Sesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
In the Matter of The Complaint of Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC, as Owner of the 2001 Godfrey Marine Company 22'0" pontoon vessel
as 1:2020cv01111
Defendant:
Micheal Doris, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC and In the Matter of The Complaint of Under the Bridge Watersports, LLC, as Owner of the 2001 Godfrey Marine Company 22'0" pontoon vessel
Claimant:
Christina Dorris, Nathaniel Dorris, Logan Tressler and others
Sims et al v. Hersl et al
as 1:2020cv00759
Defendant:
WAYNE JENKINS, Baltimore City Police Department, Momodu Gondo and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Hardrick and April Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Albert et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03377
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Damon Albert and Elizabeth Albert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickerson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2019cv02497
Petitioner:
Damon Dickerson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Elliott v. USA - 2255
as 8:2019cv02309
Petitioner:
Damon Elliott
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dickerson v. Frosh, et al
as 1:2019cv01660
Defendant:
Brian E. Frosh and Andre M. Davis
Plaintiff:
Damon Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
