Cases 21 - 30 of 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harrison v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01001
Petitioner:
Chardez Harrison
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tallman, Dylan v. Armstrong, James et al
as 3:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Dylan D. Tallman
Defendant:
Detective James Armstrong, C.O. Tristen Wanden, Captain Greg Bean and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pfister v. Bolduan et al
as 2:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Seth M Pfister
Defendant:
CO Bolduan, Unit Manager Schroeder, Unit Manager Grenier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holifield et al v. Rivamonte et al
as 2:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Al Holifield, Cora Lee Holifield, Edward Holifield and others
Defendant:
Jon Rivamonte, Miguel Correa, Karl Zuberbier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Posey v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv00618
Petitioner:
Justin P Posey
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson et al v. Quality Carriers Inc
as 2:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Dan Anderson and Matt Vesel
Defendant:
Quality Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stryker, Robert v. Winkelski, Dan
as 3:2022cv00161
Petitioner:
Robert C. Stryker
Respondent:
Warden Dan Winkelski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stryker, Robert v. Winkelski, Dan
as 3:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Robert C. Stryker
Respondent:
Warden Dan Winkelski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
