Cases 21 - 30 of 2,755
Paul v. Walmart Transportation, et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
David Paul, Sr.
Defendant:
Walmart Transportation and Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Newby v. Leu
as 1:2024cv00225
Petitioner:
Robbie Lynn Newby
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NaJacque v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. NaJacque
Defendant:
David W. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cadence Bank, N.A. et al v. TMI Consulting Incorporated
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A. and Esq. David T. Long, Jr.
Defendant:
TMI Consulting Incorporated doing business as Loom Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell et al v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joel Aaron Burrell, Tyler Bly, Joshua Clamp and others
Defendant:
David Anderson, A. King, J. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Ashaun Ra
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
