Cases 21 - 30 of 32
DeVinche Albritton v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Virginia Department of Corrections Health Services Director, DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
Miles v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Miles, III
Defendant:
William Moore, III, David B. Everett and David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmed v. Kelly et al
as 1:2010cv00184
Petitioner:
Abbas Javed Ahmed
Respondent:
Loretta Kelly and David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodrecus Morris v. David Everett
as 09-7676
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODRECUS A. MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. EVERETT
Jose Perez-Amaya v. David Everett
as 09-6913
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE TULIO PEREZ-AMAYA
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden
DeVinche Albritton v. Gene Johnson
as 09-6732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Virginia Department of Corrections Health Services Director, DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
Perez-Amaya v. Everett
as 1:2009cv00175
Petitioner:
Jose Tulio Perez-Amaya
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morris v. Everett
as 1:2008cv00488
Petitioner:
Rodrecus A. Morris
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Everett
as 3:2008cv00080
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Everett
as 3:2007cv00634
Petitioner:
Wilmer Jerome Knight
Respondent:
David B. Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
