Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Gambill v. Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office et al
as 3:2015cv05077
Plaintiff:
Bruce E. Gambill, Jr.
Defendant:
Pierce County Superior Court and Clerk's Office, US Bankruptcy Court, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalmanovitz v. Standen et al
as 2:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Steven Kalmanovitz
Defendant:
Daniel Standen , David M McGrane, John Rigas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strick v. Lentz et al
as 3:2014cv05625
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strick
Defendant:
Lentz, Brian K Lynch, Timothy Leo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00884
Plaintiff:
David M Wilson and Cheryl M Wilson
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC , Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mahoney et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2014cv00794
Plaintiff:
Robert Mahoney, Sjon C Stevens, Cliff Borjeson and others
Defendant:
Eric Holder, City of Seattle , Ed Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv02073
Plaintiff:
David M. Shaw
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
White et al v. Mortgage Capital Associates et al
as 2:2013cv01599
Plaintiff:
David M White and Minou White
Defendant:
Mortgage Capital Associates, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , Landamerica Transnation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
