Cases filed in Alaska
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Stoltenberg v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00171
Plaintiff: Edwin Allen Stoltenberg
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Dean Williams, Shannon McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Busby et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff: Billy Dean Smith and Jacob Anagick
Defendant: Bruce Busby , Robert Cordle and Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Panoam v. Rogers
as 3:2016cv00222
Plaintiff: James Panoam
Defendant: Dean Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Itta et al
as 3:2016cv00092
Plaintiff: Franswa A. Henry
Defendant: Bobby J. Itta, John E. McCrary and Dean Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alpha Marine Services, LLC v. Great Northern Engineering et al
as 3:2015cv00145
Plaintiff: Alpha Marine Services, LLC
Defendant: Great Northern Engineering , The Estate of John H. Riggs and Cheryl Dean Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeRemer v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00128
Plaintiff: Richard B. DeRemer
Defendant: Alaska Department of Corrections, Ron Taylor, L. Dean Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2015cv00092
Plaintiff: Tommie Patterson
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, John Thorsness, John Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Cook v. Marshall
as 3:2014cv00002
Petitioner: Kim M. Cook
Respondent: L. Dean Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith et al v. Corcoran et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff: Billy Dean Smith and Jacob Lee Anagick
Defendant: Robert Corcoran and G. Scott Wellard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Marshall
as 4:2013cv00016
Plaintiff: David E. Williams
Defendant: L. Dean Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?