Cases 21 - 30 of 86
DURR v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00354
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DURR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdelmeged v. Department of Army
as 21-1035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDEL RAOUF ABDELMEGED
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
NORRIS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2020cv02737
Plaintiff:
JACK K. NORRIS, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MATTWAOSHSHE et al v. NEXTERA ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01317
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MATTWAOSHSHE and JUSTIN STALLBAUMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, NEXTERA ENERGY INC, NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
O'Brien v. Department of Defense et al
as 1:2020cv00816
Defendant:
Department of Defense, US ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE, DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
Brett John O'Brien and Brett O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04888
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Abdelmeged v. Department of Army
as 1:2019cv03186
Plaintiff:
Abdelraouf Abdelmeged
Defendant:
Department of Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner et al v. United States et al
as 2:2019cv01671
Plaintiff:
Aurora Gardner and Savannah Gardner
Defendant:
Department of Defense of the United States, AMERICA UNITED STATES OF, Department of Army and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Linda Robertson v. Ryan McCarthy
as 19-2665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RYAN MCCARTHY, Secretary of the Department of Army
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
