Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Bergeron v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2018cv05671
Plaintiff:
Todd A Bergeron
Defendant:
Jerry J Larpenter , Gordy Dove, Tommy Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. USA
as 6:2017cv01564
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Drew T Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arnold v. State et al
as 3:2017cv01592
Plaintiff:
Drew Arnold
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc and State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell, et al v. Etowah County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv08985
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Lashea Bell, Amanda Leigh Turner Bishop, Carrie Adriana Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Etowah County Detention Center, Sarah Thomas and Brandy Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dabadie, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv00578
Defendant:
Ferring Barton, City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, Dana Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drew v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv06345
Plaintiff:
Pamela Drew
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. LeBlanc
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Drew Arnold
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Futch, Sr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Futch, Sr. and James Futch, Sr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Not Classified By Court:
Drew Nordgren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Drew v. Town of Church Point et al
as 6:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Bronston Drew
Defendant:
Town of Church Point, Albert Venable, Dale Thibodeaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macierez et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00074
Plaintiff:
Drew Macierez , Chris Macierez , Blake Macierez and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
