Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Livingston v. Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas et al
as 4:2010cv00809
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas, UP Old's, UP Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. McCrarey et al
as 2:2010cv00215
Petitioner:
Barry E Livingston
Respondent:
Robert McCrarey, UP Old's, UP Long and others
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Livingston v. Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas et al
as 1:2010cv00474
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas, UP Old's, UP Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. McCrarey et al
as 1:2010cv00475
Petitioner:
Barry E Livingston
Respondent:
Robert McCrarey, UP Old's, UP Long and others
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Parole of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown, Esq. v. Livingston
as 1:2010cv00739
Plaintiff:
William J. Brown, Esq.
Defendant:
Thomas E. Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Livingston v. Board of Pardon and Paroles et al
as 4:2010cv00329
Plaintiff:
Barry E Livingston
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Paroles, John Doe and Trial Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barry Livingston v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10226
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARRY E LIVINGSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Livingston v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00118
Petitioner:
Barry E Livingston
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00210
Petitioner:
Barry E Livingston
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
