Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Davis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2020cv02074
Respondent:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Dan Schnurr, State of Oregon and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Axos Bank v. Rosenblum
as 3:2020cv01712
Plaintiff:
AXOS BANK
Defendant:
State of Oregon and Ellen F. Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Sines v. John Hummel, et al
as 20-35857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ALBERT SINES
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON KROPF, MIKE QUICK, ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM and others
Pringle v. Arce et al
as 1:2020cv01323
Petitioner:
Eugene Dayton Pringle, Jr
Respondent:
Attorney General Ellen F. Rosenblum, Assessor Eva L I Arce, Josephine County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valenzuela v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv00818
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Kate Brown, Travis Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sines v. Hummel et al
as 6:2020cv00432
Defendant:
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Darryl Nakahira, Mike Quick and others
Plaintiff:
John Albert Sines and John Albert Sines, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salmon v. Nooth et al
as 2:2020cv00280
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole, Ellen F. Rosenblum and Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Richard W. Salmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Khullar et al v. DeHaan et al
as 0:2019cv61455
Defendant:
BRIAN DEHAAN, Oregon State Bar, ELLEN F ROSENBLUM and others
Plaintiff:
KHULLAR P.A. and Divya Khullar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Josephine County v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2018cv00566
Plaintiff:
Josephine County
Defendant:
Attorney General Ellen F. Rosenblum and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 17-36029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, SAMUEL ABRAHAM KUBERNICK, ANNA M. JOYCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
