Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Pusateri et al v. Klamath County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2018cv00060
Defendant:
Mark Borges, Ellis, Ryan Huntsman and others
Plaintiff:
Dalton Robert Pusateri and Matthew Robert Pusateri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elli Tillotson
as 3:2018ad00008
In Re:
Elli Tillotson
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Ellis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01748
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Unknown:
Janice E. Hebert
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jenkins v. Ellis et al
as 3:2017cv00169
Defendant:
Judge James R. Ellis and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00058
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Ellis v. Vial Fotheringham LLP
as 3:2016cv01945
Plaintiff:
Kayla Ellis
Defendant:
Vial Fotheringham LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wilson et al v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO.
as 3:2016cv01663
Plaintiff:
David Alexander, John Anderson, Boe Ellis and others
Defendant:
Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wilson et al v. K.F. Jacobsen & Co., Inc.
as 3:2016cv01662
Plaintiff:
David Alexander, John Anderson, Boe Ellis and others
Defendant:
K.F. Jacobsen & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ellis v. Young
as 2:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Scott Ellis
Defendant:
Stuart Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. USA
as 3:2016cv00558
Petitioner:
Ellis K. McCoy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
