Cases 21 - 30 of 32
SRIVASTAVA v. PAYNE et al
as 1:2011cv00909
Defendant:
KENDALE ADAMS, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
MILLER v. KIELY et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Defendant:
DEPUTY MATT F. KEPPLER, FBI AGENT BRIAN FLAHERTY, FORMER CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00036
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
POLICHEMI v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
JOSEPH POLICHEMI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ERIC HOLDER, US BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GREER et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN FELIX GREER and BARACK H OMAMA
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WU v. FERGUSON et al
as 1:2009cv00468
Plaintiff:
JIAN PING WU
Defendant:
DONALD FERGUSON, MICHAEL AYTES, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
