Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Shields v. United States District Court et al
as 4:2010cv01597
Plaintiff:
Eric Bernard Shields
Defendant:
United States District Court and Clerk of the Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
as 4:2010cv00656
Petitioner:
Martay Love
Respondent:
United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grady v. United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri
as 4:2009cv01971
Plaintiff:
Michael Grady
Defendant:
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri et al
as 4:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Anderson and Hattie P. Anderson
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, Attorney General of the United States and IRS Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Floyd et al v. Missouri, State of et al
as 1:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Richard LeRoy Floyd, Matthew Wood, Janet Woods and others
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri and United States District Court,. Western District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kiderlen v. United States Federal Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
United States Federal Corporation, United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, United States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nelson v. Joyce et al
as 4:2007cv01810
Petitioner:
Alexander Nelson
Respondent:
Jennifer Joyce, State of Missouri, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit and U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
