Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Taft et al v. Palmer et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL PLEADINGS MUST BE DOCKETED IN THE LEAD CASE C12-4086-DEO
as 5:2013cv04047
Plaintiff:
Dave L Taft, Jr , Paul Huston , Michael Millsap and others
Defendant:
Charles Palmer and Jason Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risdal et al v. Smith et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - DOCKET IN LEAD CASE C05-4065 DEO
as 5:2011cv04035
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal and David Taft
Defendant:
Jason Smith , Mike Nixon , Adam Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Risdal v. Adams et al
as 4:2011cv00008
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Amy Kepes and Steven Addington
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Risdal v. State of Iowa
as 4:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
Eddie C Risdal
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Risdal v. Smith et al
as 4:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal
Defendant:
Jason Smith and Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie Risdal v. Tom Miller, et al
as 09-2827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Miller and Stephen Holmes
Risdal v. Miller
as 4:2009cv00255
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal
Defendant:
Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Risdal v. Smith et al
as 5:2009cv04050
Petitioner:
Eddie C Risdal
Respondent:
Jason Smith, Kelly Goodlaxson and Janne L Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eddie Risdal v. Chester Culver
as 09-2236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddie C. Risdal
Defendant - Appellee:
Chester J. Culver
Risdal v. Polk County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
Eddie C Risdal
Defendant:
Polk County Board of Supervisors, Story County Board of Supervisors, Cherokee County Board Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
