Cases 21 - 30 of 222
Chavez v. City of New York
as 24-206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW YORK, ERIC ADAMS and DAVID CHOKSHI
Kavasutra 6th Street, Inc. v. Adams
as 24-15
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAVASUTRA 6TH STREET, INC. and KAVASUTRA 10TH STREET, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC ADAMS, as Mayor of the City of New York, CITY OF NEW YORK, Commissioner ASHWIN VASAN, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Trisvan v. Mayor of New York Eric Adams et al
as 1:2023cv09051
Plaintiff:
John Trisvan
Defendant:
Mayor of New York Eric Adams, Edward Caban and Haleras Rodriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams (PS) v. Shannon et al
as 1:2023cv03317
Plaintiff:
Eric Adams
Defendant:
Shannon and Robberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr-Williams v. County & State et al
as 1:2023cv10593
Plaintiff:
Frankie Orr-Williams
Defendant:
County & State, Adam Silver, Daiva White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Azar
as 23-7855
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL CLARKE
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX AZAR, II, Secretary, KATHY HOCHUL, Governor, HOWARD C. ZUCKER, Commissioner and others
Moore v. The NYC Department of Education et al
as 1:2023cv08308
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Moore
Defendant:
The NYC Department of Education, Mayor Eric Adams and Students A,B,C, and D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCartney et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08232
Plaintiff:
Paul McCartney, Craig Collopy, Jean Pierre Sylvestre and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Eric Adams and David Chokshi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv09528
Plaintiff:
Khaliq Alim Anderson
Defendant:
Gov. Kathy Hochul, William J. Hochul, Gov. Andrew Coumo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
