Cases 21 - 30 of 202
Lopez Maya, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1957
Petitioner:
JOSUE EDENILS LOPEZ MAYA and ELVIN ESAU LOPEZ MAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Segovia v. Catusco's Pizza, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07302
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Esau Segovia
Defendant:
Catusco's Pizza, Inc. and James Catusco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Hernandez-Chavez
as 22-51040
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos Esau Hernandez-Chavez, also known as Carlos Chavez-Hernandez, also known as Carlos Hernandez-Esau, also known as Carlos Hernandez-Chavez, also known as Raul Gonzalez-Martinez, also known as Raul Martinez-Gonzalez, also known as Roberto Aguirre
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hezekiah Baker v. Weststar Credit Union
as 22-16354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HEZEKIAH ESAU BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTSTAR CREDIT UNION and DEBORAH FARIS
CUEVAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17224
Plaintiff:
ESAU CUEVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17173
Plaintiff:
ESAU ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glacier County Regional Port Authority v. Esau et al
as 4:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Glacier County Regional Port Authority
Defendant:
Laurie Esau, Montana Human Rights Commission and Montana Human Rights Bureau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
MOFFETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16701
Plaintiff:
ESAU MOFFETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv01242
Petitioner:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metro Police Department and Las Vegas Metro Police #9462
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
