Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Vaughan et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughan, Dominic Pagliuso, Ralph Hensley II and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Baker v. West Start Credit Union, Inclusive
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
West Start Credit Union, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Romero Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-13
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMALIA ROMERO VENTURA, WILSON HUMBERTO RAMIREZ ROMERO and DANY ESAU RAMIREZ ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edwin Orellana Romero v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-3247
Petitioner:
EDWIN ESAU ORELLANA ROMERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Baker v. Dragon Motel Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
Dragon Motel Inc, Inclusive West Star Credit Union and West Star Credit Union
Baker v. Dragon Motel
as 2:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
Dragon Motel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis, Sr. v. Pendarvis et al
as 2:2023cv05352
Plaintiff:
Esau Demetrius Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Marvin Pendarvis and Martha K. Runey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUEVAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12729
Plaintiff:
ESAU CUEVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolanyk v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patrick Wolanyk and Beach Time, LLC
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Rebecca Esau and Lee Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
