Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Baker v. West Start Credit Union, Inclusive
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
West Start Credit Union, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Romero Ventura, et al. v. Garland
as 24-13
Petitioner:
MARIA ROMALIA ROMERO VENTURA, WILSON HUMBERTO RAMIREZ ROMERO and DANY ESAU RAMIREZ ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Baker v. Dragon Motel Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
Dragon Motel Inc, Inclusive West Star Credit Union and West Star Credit Union
Baker v. Dragon Motel
as 2:2023cv01751
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Esau Baker
Defendant:
Dragon Motel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolanyk v. City of Portland, Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv01349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Patrick Wolanyk and Beach Time, LLC
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Rebecca Esau and Lee Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BNSF Railway Company v. Esau et al
as 6:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Laurie Esau, Montana Department of Labor and Industry and John Elizandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Montana Medical Association, et al v. Austin Knudsen, et al
as 23-35014
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MONTANA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, FIVE VALLEYS UROLOGY, PLLC, PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - MONTANA and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MONTANA NURSES ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellant:
AUSTIN KNUDSEN, Montana Attorney General and LAURIE ESAU, Montana Commissioner of Labor and Industry
Lopez Maya, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1957
Petitioner:
JOSUE EDENILS LOPEZ MAYA and ELVIN ESAU LOPEZ MAYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
