Cases 21 - 30 of 298
Winn v. FBOP et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Defendant:
FBOP and FCI McDowell
Plaintiff:
Alshabazz Winn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woods v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00130
Respondent:
Hazelton FCI Warden H. Ray
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods and Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nofflett v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nofflett
Defendant:
FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
