Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Beverly Beard v. Joe Keffer
as 11-10942
Petitioner - Appellant:
BEVERLY J. BEARD
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE KEFFER, Warden, Federal Medical Center-Carswell
Gloria Morris v. Joe Keffer
as 11-10386
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLORIA MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOE KEFFER, Federal Medical Center - Carswell
Heather Souza v. Federal Medical Ctr Carswell, et al
as 11-10282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEATHER ANN SOUZA, also known as Heather Ann Souza-Rodriguez
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER CARSWELL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, E. CHAPMAN, in her individual and official capacity as Warden of FMC Carswell and others
Isaac v. Warden, Federal Medical Center, Carswell
as 5:2011cv00051
Petitioner:
Makeysha Dion Isaac
Respondent:
Warden, Federal Medical Center, Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
v. Keffer et al
as 4:2010cv00579
Respondent:
Joe Keffer and Federal Medical Center - Carswell
Petitioner:
Martha R Crowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holli Lundahl v. USA, et al
as 10-10223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, personally and as assignee of M.D. Diet Companies
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER CARSWELL, R. E. GREGG, Doctor and others
Houston v. Federal Medical Center Carswell
as 4:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Rose Mary Houston
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Carswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Federal Medical Center Carswell et al
as 4:2009cv00733
Plaintiff:
Sharon Celesta Brown
Defendant:
Federal Medical Center Carswell and W Elaine Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-11100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
