Cases 21 - 30 of 36
FLYNN v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2015cv01245
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CAULDWELL, MARVEDA DUNKARD and INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Plaintiff:
SHELLINDA CARGILE FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
FLYNN v. SMITH
as 2:2015cv00207
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS M. FLYNN
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. The Paper of Wabash County, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Paper of Wabash County, Inc., Ashley Flynn, Christopher Hawley Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flynn v. Superintendent
as 2:2015cv00096
Petitioner:
Spencer Flynn
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLYNN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2015cv00056
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS M. FLYNN
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flynn v. Thatcher et al
as 3:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Terrance Flynn
Defendant:
Marion Thatcher and Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01275
Plaintiff:
Brian G Flynn
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERFORMANCE DYNAMICS, INC. v. FLYNN et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Defendant:
ANDREW BENNETT, COLORADO PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALISTS, LLC, P.C., EVIDENCE IN MOTION, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PERFORMANCE DYNAMICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
