Cases 21 - 30 of 55
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. FRANCO et al
as 2:2014cv02447
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
HECTOR FRANCO and 1851 NETWORTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ASTURI et al
as 2:2014cv00541
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
FRANCO ASTURI, JAMES B. MINTON, SR., MAGGIE SISTEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. FRANCO et al
as 2:2014cv02182
Plaintiff:
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC
Defendant:
HECTOR FRANCO and 1851 NETWORTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
REUBEN v. OMI/ZONE 5 et al
as 2:2012cv01398
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. REUBEN
Defendant:
OMI/ZONE 5, OFFICER DOVER, CITY COUNTY MORGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALDRICH et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv04864
Plaintiff:
MARIE J. ALDRICH , LEONEL R. ALVAREZ , SARAH ARENSMAN and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Franco v. USA
as 1:2012cv01644
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Luis Rodriguez Franco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
VF IMAGEWEAR, INC. et al v. FRANCO APPAREL GROUP, INC.
as 2:2012cv02054
Plaintiff:
VF IMAGEWEAR, INC. and IMAGEWEAR APPAREL CORP.
Defendant:
FRANCO APPAREL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
FRANCO v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68055
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO FRANCO
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
